Respiratory failure: a patient's perspective and clinical cases

The major morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 is due to acute viral pneumonitis that evolves to ARDS. Furthermore, COVID-19 patients may be affected by extrarespiratory involvement, including cardiac, renal, neurological and vascular complications. Different hospitals reorganised their logistical structures to optimise the care of COVID-19 patients and ensure infection control, and the public health scenario worldwide was characterised by the rapid spread of multidisciplinary units specifically dedicated to COVID-19 patients. This chapter describes the personal experience and clinical case of a previously healthy and active patient who suffered from severe COVID-19. Two other cases of patients hospitalised because of severe acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 are also discussed.Copyright © ERS 2021.

A phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reparixin in severe COVID-19 pneumonia

Introduction: The clinical progression of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with uncontrolled activation of inflammatory cytokines that results in excessive tissue injury, among which is interleukin-8 (IL-8). Aim(s): To assess the efficacy and safety of reparixin, an inhibitor of IL-8 receptors, as add-on therapy to the standard of care for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Method(s): This was a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 requiring oxygen support and/or noninvasive ventilation. From February to July 2021, patients were randomized 2:1 to oral reparixin or placebo in addition to the standard of care for up to 21 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure. This study was funded by Dompe Farmaceutici SpA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04878055). Result(s): Of the 278 randomized patients, 185 patients in the reparixin group and 94 patients in the placebo group were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at day 28 was greater in the reparixin group but not statistically significant (n=152 (89.4%) vs. n=71 (85.5%), OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.75 - 3.51, p= 0.2). While time to recovery was not different between groups, patients who received reparixin had a lower intensive care unit admission rate. Reparixin was well-tolerated. Conclusion(s): This trial did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint due to the low mortality in both arms, yet reparixin showed a promising trend towards limiting disease progression. A confirmatory Phase 3 study is currently underway.

Use of Defibrotide in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia;Results of the Defi-VID19 Phase 2 Trial

Background: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from pauci-symptomatic forms to severe disease characterized by respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) management, as well as multisystem involvement characterized by sepsis, organ dysfunction and death. Treatment of COVID-19 is not standardized, and respiratory failure from ARDS is the leading cause of mortality;in-hospital mortality at 28-days in our tertiary care center in Lombardia, northern Italy was 23% during the first wave in 2020(Ciceri et al. 2020). Endothelial damage and thrombo-inflammation have been identified as common to both COVID-19 pathophysiology and veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS). Defibrotide (DF) has endothelial-protective properties, with pro-fibrinolytic, anti-thrombotic, anti-ischemic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-adhesive activity, but no significant systemic anticoagulant effects and is approved for the treatment of severe VOD/SOS. Aim: A prospective, multicenter, phase II, single-arm, open label trial (DEFI-VID19, NCT04335201) was conducted in patients (pts) with COVID-19 ARDS to evaluate the efficacy of DF in addition to best available therapy per institutional guidelines. The primary endpoint was respiratory-failure rate (RFR) defined as progression of respiratory failure, i.e. severe gas transfer deficit (PaO2/FiO2<200 mmHg), need of ICU or death at day+14 from treatment start. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) at 28 days, duration of hospitalization and safety. A sample size of 50 pts was calculated to detect an absolute reduction of 20% in RFR at day+14, assuming a failure rate in non-treated pts of 70% (alpha=5%, power=90%, two-sided test). Pts received DF intravenously at 6.25 mg/kg/dose by 2-hour infusion repeated every 6 hours. Expected treatment duration was 14 days, with earlier discontinuation if clinical improvement occurred. LMWH at prophylactic dose was allowed. Approval was provided by the National IRB for COVID-19 trials at Institute Spallanzani (Rome) and by the Italian Agency for Drug (AIFA). All patients provided written informed consent. Results: Overall, 52 pts were enrolled from September 2020 to April 2021;48 were evaluated for efficacy and safety;4 pts were excluded due to screen failure (n=2) or withdrawal of informed consent at day 2 after defibrotide was initiated (n=2). Median age was 60.5 years (range 53-71);35 pts (73%) were male and 65% had comorbidities, with high blood pressure, obesity and COPD most common. Two pts had pre-existing diagnoses of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Median time from onset of COVID-19 symptoms and from Sars-COV2 PCR by nasal swab to enrollment were 8 (range 7-10) and 3 days (range 1-6), respectively. All pts were hospitalized and scale 5 of 8-category ordinal scale by WHO criteria, requiring noninvasive ventilation with CPAP or high-flow oxygen, with a median P/F ratio of 211 (range 134-275) mmHg. At treatment start, the median and (range) lymphocyte counts, LDH, CRP, ferritin, D-dimer and IL-6 were 0.7 (0.5-0.9) x 10e9/L;404 (291-491) U/L;49 (22-97) mg/L;823 (363-1088) ng/ml;0.44 (0.28-1.29) µg/mL and 20 (11-32), respectively. Median treatment duration was 8.5 days (range 6-11). Overall, 13/48 pts (27%) discontinued the treatment due to clinical worsening and/or need of further therapies: 9 pts experienced progressive respiratory failure and 6 of those were transferred to ICU for IOT (one pt required ECMO), and 4 required full anticoagulation due to pulmonary embolism (n=1), ischemic stroke (n=1), and femoral deep venous thrombosis (n=2). All pts who completed the treatment 35/48 (73%) were discharged with no need of oxygen support. Overall, 14 SAEs have been reported in a median time of 6 days (range 2-10): all unrelated to DF. No pts experienced hemorrhagic events. The incidence of RFR at day 14 was 25 (+/- 6)%, and at day 28, 27 (+/- 6) %. Probability of OS at day 28 was 89 (+/-4) %, at day 60 83 (+/- 5)%. Overall, 8 pts died from COVID-19 -related complications. No pts required re-admission after hospital discha ge (median 14 days) or died after discharge. Conclusion: Treatment with DF in pts with grade 5 WHO COVID 19 ARDS does not induce bleeding, and is associated with rapid restoration of respiratory function (73% of pts). Notably, no oxygen support was needed at discharge and a 1-month OS rate of 89% was observed, which is higher than historical controls (77%) treated in the same setting. Disclosures: Richardson: Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy;Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Consultancy;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding;Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy;Secura Bio: Consultancy;Regeneron: Consultancy;Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy. Ciceri: IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele: Current Employment. Carlo-Stella: Incyte: Honoraria;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Honoraria;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Janssen Oncology: Honoraria;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Low testosterone predicts hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency and mortality in patients with COVID-19 disease: another piece in the COVID puzzle.

PURPOSE: Hypogonadism was described in high number of male subjects with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this study, we investigated whether low testosterone (T) values may influence the clinical presentation and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia in a large population of adult males with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). METHODS: Two hundred twenty one adult males hospitalized for COVID-19 at the IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan (Italy) were consecutively evaluated for arterial partial pressure oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, serum T and inflammatory parameters at study entry, need of ventilation during hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Subjects low T values (< 8 nmol/L; 176 cases) were significantly older (P = 0.001) and had higher serum interleukin-6 (P = 0.001), C-reactive protein (P < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (P < 0.001), ferritin (P = 0.012), lower P/F ratio (P = 0.001), increased prevalence of low T3 syndrome (P = 0.041), acute respiratory insufficiency (P < 0.001), more frequently need of ventilation (P < 0.001) and higher mortality rate (P = 0.009) compared to subjects with higher T values. In the multivariable regression analyses, T values maintained significant associations with acute respiratory insufficiency (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.94; P < 0.001 and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.95; P = 0.009), independently of age, comorbidities, thyroid function and inflammation. CONCLUSION: Low T levels values are associated with unfavorable outcome of COVID-19. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of hypogonadism related to COVID-19 and the clinical impact of T replacement during and after acute illness.

Vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism and respiratory insufficiency in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Hypovitaminosis D has emerged as potential risk factor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the general population with variable effects on the outcome of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to investigate the impact of hypovitaminosis D and secondary hyperparathyroidism on respiratory outcomes of COVID-19. METHODS: Three-hundred-forty-eight consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at the IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan (Italy) were evaluated for arterial partial pressure oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, serum 25hydroxy-vitamin D [25(OH)D], parathyroid hormone (PTH) and inflammatory parameters at study entry and need of ventilation during the hospital stay. RESULTS: In the entire population, vitamin D deficiency (i.e., 25(OH)D values < 12 ng/mL) was significantly associated with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure at the study entry [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.29-4.74; P = 0.006], independently of age and sex of subjects, serum calcium and inflammatory parameters. In patients evaluated for serum PTH (97 cases), secondary hyperparathyroidism combined with vitamin D deficiency was significantly associated with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure at study entry (P = 0.001) and need of ventilation during the hospital stay (P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that vitamin D deficiency, when associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism, may negatively impact the clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia.